TAGS vs. FLUD
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. TAGS is passively managed, while FLUD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAGS returned -0.80%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for FLUD. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.
Performance
TAGS vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than FLUD's 1.68% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -4.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
FLUD
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.23% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 21.94% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.68% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 5.95% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and FLUD is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | -0.05 |
The correlation between TAGS and FLUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
FLUD
TAGS vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.61 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 10.33 | -10.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 41.22 | -42.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than FLUD's maximum drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and FLUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -1.66% | -74.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -0.44% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | -0.59% | -32.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -1.66% | -35.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -0.00% | -64.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -0.24% | -57.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 0.11% | +5.13% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) at 0.39%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 0.39% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 0.78% | +9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 1.61% | +11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 1.34% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 1.26% | +16.74% |
TAGS vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAGS vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.26% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and FLUD have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FLUD (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs FLUD's -1.66%.
On 5-year performance, FLUD leads with 3.65% vs -0.80% for TAGS. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLUD has performed better with a 3.65% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for TAGS.
FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.15% for FLUD.
FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and FLUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer