TAGS vs. CXRN
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while CXRN is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. TAGS is passively managed, while CXRN is actively managed. Over the past year, TAGS returned -0.95% vs -23.31% for CXRN. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CXRN.
Performance
TAGS vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
CXRN
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -14.31%
- 1Y
- -23.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -0.49% |
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | -13.42% | -25.68% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and CXRN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between TAGS and CXRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
CXRN
TAGS vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | -0.93 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | -1.67 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | -0.64 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.61 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than CXRN's maximum drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and CXRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -46.71% | -29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -25.27% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.69% | -46.16% | -17.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -30.08% | -27.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 13.97% | -8.09% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 5.52%, while Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) has a volatility of 15.39%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | CXRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 15.39% | -9.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 26.75% | -16.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 36.32% | -23.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 36.90% | -20.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 36.90% | -18.86% |
TAGS vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAGS vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF | 2.61% | 3.30% | 0.13% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and CXRN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CXRN has higher volatility (15.39%) compared to TAGS (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs CXRN's -46.71%.
On 1-year performance, TAGS leads with -0.95% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TAGS has performed better with a -0.95% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CXRN.
CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CXRN is Leveraged Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.95% for CXRN.
TAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and CXRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer