TAGS vs. COMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB).
TAGS and COMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAGS is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium TAGS Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2012. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017.
Performance
TAGS vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TAGS vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 10.65% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -6.43% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.42% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 24.42% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 0.50%
- 3Y*
- -6.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- -0.44%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TAGS vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
COMB
TAGS vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 1.85 | -1.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 2.44 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 3.57 | -3.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 9.81 | -9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 1.85 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.82 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.52 | -0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and COMB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TAGS vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.27% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and COMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -33.50% | -42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -9.19% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -26.63% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.14% | 0.00% | -62.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.15% | -12.25% | -44.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 3.34% | +4.25% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 4.78%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 7.51% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 13.80% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.47% | 17.18% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 16.53% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 15.05% | +3.29% |