TAGS vs. COMB
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. TAGS is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAGS returned -1.51%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for COMB. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
TAGS vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 26.81% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- 1Y
- -0.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.51%
- 10Y*
- -1.74%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 26.81%
- 6M
- 25.89%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 6.11% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -6.43% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 26.81% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and COMB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
COMB
TAGS vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 5.08 | -5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 13.24 | -13.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 2.29 | -2.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.68 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 0.52 | -0.75 |
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -33.50% | -42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -7.69% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | -11.35% | -22.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -26.63% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.69% | -4.35% | -59.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -12.06% | -45.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.88% | 2.94% | +2.94% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 5.14%. This indicates that TAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.14% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 14.99% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 17.02% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 16.70% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 15.13% | +2.91% |
TAGS vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAGS vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.14% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and COMB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to COMB (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 11.27% vs -1.51% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, COMB has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 11.27% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer