TAGS vs. COMB
TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. TAGS is passively managed, while COMB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TAGS returned -0.80%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for COMB. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAGS charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.
Performance
TAGS vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAGS achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 14.97% return.
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- -4.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.80%
- 10Y*
- -1.88%
COMB
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
TAGS vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.23% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -6.43% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 14.97% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAGS and COMB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAGS vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
TAGS
COMB
TAGS vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.24 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 1.71 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 6.79 | -7.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TAGS vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAGS drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGS and COMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -33.50% | -42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -13.28% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.73% | -13.28% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -26.63% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -13.28% | -51.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -12.04% | -45.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 3.36% | +1.88% |
Volatility
TAGS vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) is 3.29%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that TAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAGS | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 3.69% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 15.24% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 17.34% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 16.69% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 15.14% | +2.86% |
TAGS vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAGS has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TAGS vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.87% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAGS and COMB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMB has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to TAGS (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGS dropped -76.40% vs COMB's -33.50%.
On 5-year performance, COMB leads with 9.61% vs -0.80% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, TAGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMB has performed better with a 9.61% return vs -0.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for COMB.
COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.87%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.
TAGS is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TAGS and 0.25% for COMB.
COMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TAGS and COMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer