COMB vs. COMT
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT).
COMB and COMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017. COMT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 15, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COMB or COMT.
Correlation
The correlation between COMB and COMT is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
COMB vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
COMB:
0.33
COMT:
0.18
COMB:
0.54
COMT:
0.35
COMB:
1.06
COMT:
1.04
COMB:
0.15
COMT:
0.10
COMB:
0.71
COMT:
0.56
COMB:
5.30%
COMT:
4.67%
COMB:
11.54%
COMT:
14.28%
COMB:
-33.50%
COMT:
-51.89%
COMB:
-20.44%
COMT:
-22.34%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COMB having a 3.76% return and COMT slightly higher at 3.90%.
COMB
3.76%
-0.68%
-1.72%
3.23%
6.27%
N/A
COMT
3.90%
-0.31%
-4.37%
2.27%
5.50%
1.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COMB vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
COMB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COMB vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COMB vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
COMB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 0.00% | 5.83% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.00% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% | 0.56% |
Drawdowns
COMB vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COMB drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMB and COMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COMB vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) is 2.93%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that COMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.