TACN vs. TGRW

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) and TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TACN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TGRW.

Performance

TACN vs. TGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACN achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than TGRW's 3.37% return.

TACN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 8.65%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TGRW

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: 20.28%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACN vs. TGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	10.93%	1.68%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	3.37%	-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TACN and TGRW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.63

Return for Risk

TACN vs. TGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TGRW

TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACN vs. TGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TACN	TGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.08	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.13	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.01	—

Drawdowns

TACN vs. TGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACN drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum TGRW drawdown of -43.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACN and TGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACN	TGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-43.33%	+32.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-4.07%	+2.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-12.35%	+9.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TACN	TGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	17.54%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	23.44%	-5.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	23.01%	-5.42%

TACN vs. TGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRW's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

TACN vs. TGRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TACN nor TGRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.40%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TACN and TGRW in my portfolio?

TACN and TGRW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TACN or TGRW?

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TACN or TGRW?

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TACN or TGRW?

TACN and TGRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TACN and TGRW?

TACN is categorized as Actively Managed, while TGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TACN and 0.52% for TGRW.