TACN vs. TFFI
TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) and TFFI (Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. TACN charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TFFI.
Performance
TACN vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TACN
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TFFI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACN vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 1.61% |
TFFI Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF | 0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACN and TFFI is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026 | -0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACN vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACN vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACN drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, which is greater than TFFI's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACN and TFFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACN | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -4.23% | -6.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.83% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -1.66% | -0.71% |
Volatility
TACN vs. TFFI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACN | TFFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 7.92% | +9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 7.92% | +9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 7.92% | +9.50% |
TACN vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACN vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison
Neither TACN nor TFFI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TACN and TFFI have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.
TACN and TFFI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TACN and 1.01% for TFFI.
Find the right allocation for TACN and TFFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer