PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TACN vs. TGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TACN vs. TGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACN achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly higher than TGRT's -1.63% return.


TACN

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.08%
6M
4.64%
YTD
10.54%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

TGRT

1D
-1.74%
1M
-3.33%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
-1.63%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$184.69K$112.68K$82.44K
$4.29M$3.92M$7.59M

TACN vs. TGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TACN and TGRT is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TACN vs. TGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TACN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TGRT
TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TACN vs. TGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TACNTGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.90

TACN vs. TGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TACN vs. TGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACN drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum TGRT drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACN and TGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TACNTGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-22.04%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-8.40%

+6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-3.35%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

Volatility

TACN vs. TGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TACNTGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

17.52%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

19.18%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

19.18%

-2.04%

TACN vs. TGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TGRT's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TACN vs. TGRT - Dividend Comparison

TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM202520242023
TACN
T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
0.08%0.08%0.09%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TACN and TGRT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TGRT.

TGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

TACN is categorized as Actively Managed, while TGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TACN and 0.38% for TGRT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TACN and TGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer