TACN vs. CLSE
TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TACN charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.
Performance
TACN vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TACN achieves a 10.54% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 22.28% return.
TACN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CLSE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 18.34%
- YTD
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 41.83%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.56M | $11.58M | $9.63M | |
| $184.69K | $112.68K | $82.44K |
TACN vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 10.54% | 1.68% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 22.28% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TACN and CLSE is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TACN vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
TACN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLSE
TACN vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TACN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 29.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TACN vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TACN drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum CLSE drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACN and CLSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TACN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -16.45% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -2.99% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -3.52% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.43% | — |
Volatility
TACN vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TACN | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 13.73% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 13.86% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 13.86% | +3.28% |
TACN vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TACN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TACN vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.78% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% |
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TACN and CLSE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.
CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.
TACN is categorized as Actively Managed, while CLSE is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TACN and 1.52% for CLSE.
Find the right allocation for TACN and CLSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer