PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. SPTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTM

1D
0.38%
1M
1.91%
6M
9.45%
YTD
11.68%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-7.01%
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
11.68%16.93%23.87%25.55%-17.75%28.58%17.94%31.34%-11.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and SPTM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2018

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between SZNE and SPTM has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SZNE vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
SPTM

Financial Services

38.7%
11.4%

Industrials

13.0%
8.9%

Energy

9.3%
3.3%

Technology

5.6%
37.4%

Healthcare

5.1%
8.4%

Utilities

5.0%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
10.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
10.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
4.4%

Financial Services

SZNE
38.7%
SPTM
11.4%

Industrials

SZNE
13.0%
SPTM
8.9%

Energy

SZNE
9.3%
SPTM
3.3%

Technology

SZNE
5.6%
SPTM
37.4%

Healthcare

SZNE
5.1%
SPTM
8.4%

Utilities

SZNE
5.0%
SPTM
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
3.7%
SPTM
10.1%

Communication Services

SZNE
2.9%
SPTM
10.0%

Real Estate

SZNE
2.2%
SPTM
2.2%

Basic Materials

SZNE
1.6%
SPTM
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE
1.3%
SPTM
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPTM
SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SZNESPTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.24

SZNE vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNESPTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

Volatility

SZNE vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNESPTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

SZNE vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than SPTM's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPTM
SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
1.05%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.56%1.72%1.90%1.66%1.91%1.92%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and SPTM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 1.05% for SPTM.

SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.03% for SPTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and SPTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer