SZNE vs. QUS
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
SZNE vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
SZNE vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and QUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SZNE and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
QUS
Technology
SZNE
QUS
Industrials
SZNE
QUS
Basic Materials
SZNE
QUS
Communication Services
SZNE
QUS
Energy
SZNE
QUS
Utilities
SZNE
QUS
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
QUS
Financial Services
SZNE
-
QUS
Healthcare
SZNE
-
QUS
Real Estate
SZNE
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
QUS
SZNE vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.59 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 11.54 | -6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.95 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.78 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.77 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -33.78% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -6.85% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -13.94% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -22.30% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -0.50% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -3.70% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.53% | +1.51% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 1.78% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 6.66% | +4.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 9.09% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 14.33% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 16.42% | +3.68% |
SZNE vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than QUS's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and QUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.31% for QUS.
SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer