PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


SZNE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.07%
YTD
9.68%
6M
10.60%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
9.68%-3.44%2.05%6.53%-12.33%26.36%4.03%35.75%-6.90%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and QUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.82

The correlation between SZNE and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SZNE vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SZNE
QUS

Consumer Cyclical

29.7%
5.8%

Technology

25.3%
26.3%

Industrials

23.6%
8.6%

Basic Materials

20.3%
2.3%

Communication Services

0.5%
10.2%

Energy

0.3%
4.6%

Utilities

0.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Financial Services

-

14.6%

Healthcare

-

13.4%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SZNE
29.7%
QUS
5.8%

Technology

SZNE
25.3%
QUS
26.3%

Industrials

SZNE
23.6%
QUS
8.6%

Basic Materials

SZNE
20.3%
QUS
2.3%

Communication Services

SZNE
0.5%
QUS
10.2%

Energy

SZNE
0.3%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

SZNE
0.3%
QUS
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

SZNE

-

QUS
9.2%

Financial Services

SZNE

-

QUS
14.6%

Healthcare

SZNE

-

QUS
13.4%

Real Estate

SZNE

-

QUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE
SZNE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SZNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZNE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SZNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZNE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SZNEQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.59

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

11.54

-6.39

SZNE vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZNE Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZNE and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SZNEQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.95

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.78

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.77

-0.43

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-33.78%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-6.85%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.92%

-13.94%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-22.30%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.50%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-3.70%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

1.53%

+1.51%

Volatility

SZNE vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that SZNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.78%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

6.66%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

9.09%

+5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

14.33%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

16.42%

+3.68%

SZNE vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.37%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and QUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SZNE has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.31% for QUS.

SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer