SZNE vs. MFUS
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
SZNE vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and MFUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SZNE and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
MFUS
Technology
SZNE
MFUS
Industrials
SZNE
MFUS
Basic Materials
SZNE
MFUS
Communication Services
SZNE
MFUS
Energy
SZNE
MFUS
Utilities
SZNE
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
MFUS
Financial Services
SZNE
-
MFUS
Healthcare
SZNE
-
MFUS
Real Estate
SZNE
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
MFUS
SZNE vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.47 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.41 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 18.13 | -12.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.63 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.86 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.79 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than MFUS's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -35.21% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -6.39% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -15.39% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -18.22% | -4.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | 0.00% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -4.00% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 1.55% | +1.49% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) is 2.73%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that SZNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 3.19% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 8.22% | +3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 10.72% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.03% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 17.35% | +2.75% |
SZNE vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, which matches MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and MFUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SZNE (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 1.44% for SZNE. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SZNE has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 1.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.36% for MFUS.
SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer