PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZNE vs. GXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZNE vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SZNE

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXLC

1D
0.44%
1M
2.11%
6M
9.40%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and GXLC is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZNE vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SZNE vs. GXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SZNE vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZNEGXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

Volatility

SZNE vs. GXLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZNEGXLCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.61%

SZNE vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZNE vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than GXLC's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GXLC
Global X U.S. 500 ETF
0.63%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SZNE
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
1.23%1.47%1.20%1.21%1.11%0.79%1.37%0.90%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZNE and GXLC have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SZNE.

SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.63% for GXLC.

SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while GXLC tracks Solactive GBS United States 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.02% for GXLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZNE and GXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer