SZK vs. OOQB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. SZK is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, SZK returned 2.69% vs -27.35% for OOQB. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.

Performance

SZK vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.

SZK

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: -10.45%
• 6M: -8.35%
• 1Y: 2.69%
• 3Y*: -4.48%
• 5Y*: -3.44%
• 10Y*: -16.12%

OOQB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -24.99%
• 1Y: -27.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	-10.45%	10.36%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-18.43%	-13.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and OOQB is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

SZK vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK

SZK Risk / Return Rank: 10
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 4
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SZK	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	-0.53	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	-0.50	+0.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.94	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	-0.51	+0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	-0.91	+1.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SZK vs. OOQB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the OOQB Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZK and OOQB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SZK	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	-0.53	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	-0.41	-0.18

Drawdowns

SZK vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and OOQB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SZK	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-53.44%	-45.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	-53.44%	+24.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.24%	-43.69%	-55.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.99%	-23.26%	-58.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.87%	30.11%	-17.24%

Volatility

SZK vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SZK	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	0.00%	+8.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	39.39%	-19.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.19%	51.57%	-26.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.45%	58.12%	-26.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.60%	58.12%	-24.52%

SZK vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZK vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	11.62%	9.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods	2.65%	2.90%	5.70%	4.03%	0.56%	0.00%	0.19%	1.70%	0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZK and OOQB in my portfolio?

SZK and OOQB have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SZK or OOQB?

SZK has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs OOQB's -53.44%.

Which ETF is better, SZK or OOQB?

On 1-year performance, SZK leads with 2.69% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SZK or OOQB?

Over the 1-year period, SZK has performed better with a 2.69% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZK or OOQB?

OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZK or OOQB?

OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 2.65% for SZK.

What is the main difference between SZK and OOQB?

SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.75% for OOQB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SZK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.