PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SZK vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SZK vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SZK has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of -16.07%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.16% annualized return.


SZK

1D
0.25%
1M
6.20%
YTD
-9.91%
6M
-7.73%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
-4.29%
5Y*
-3.68%
10Y*
-16.07%

XLP

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
5.94%
6M
5.31%
1Y
1.46%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZK vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SZK
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods
-9.91%3.37%-11.33%-3.10%47.20%-37.78%-58.24%-39.43%33.62%-27.22%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.94%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SZK and XLP is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007

-0.73

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SZK and XLP has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.73 to -0.98, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SZK vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZK
SZK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SZK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZK Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SZK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZK vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SZKXLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.13

0.12

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.37

0.26

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

0.16

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.26

0.31

-0.05

SZK vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SZK Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SZK and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SZKXLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.12

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.42

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

0.49

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.43

-1.02

Drawdowns

SZK vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SZKXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-35.90%

-63.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.26%

-9.69%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.81%

-12.39%

-29.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.81%

-16.30%

-25.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.78%

-24.51%

-62.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.24%

-8.58%

-90.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.99%

-7.06%

-74.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.83%

4.90%

+7.93%

Volatility

SZK vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 3.99%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SZKXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

3.99%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

9.86%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.18%

12.66%

+12.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.45%

13.30%

+18.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.61%

14.73%

+18.88%

SZK vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SZK vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than XLP's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SZK
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods
2.63%2.90%5.70%4.03%0.56%0.00%0.19%1.70%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SZK and XLP have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SZK has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to XLP (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.16% vs -16.07% for SZK. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.16% return vs -16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.63% for SZK.

SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while XLP tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.08% for XLP.

SZK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SZK and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer