SZK vs. XLP
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SZK returned -16.29%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for XLP. Their -0.74 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.
Performance
SZK vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -17.72% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SZK has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of -16.29%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.
SZK
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -17.72%
- 1Y
- -11.68%
- 3Y*
- -5.80%
- 5Y*
- -3.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.29%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.51%
XLP
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $85.70K | $65.45K | $43.62K | |
| $1.02B | $989.49M | $1.01B |
SZK vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -17.72% | 3.37% | -11.33% | -3.10% | 47.20% | -37.78% | -58.24% | -39.43% | 33.62% | -27.22% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 10.87% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and XLP is -0.99, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.74 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SZK and XLP has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.74 to -0.99, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
XLP
SZK vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.99 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 1.80 | -2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZK vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and XLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -35.90% | -63.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -9.69% | -19.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | -11.42% | -30.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | -16.30% | -25.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | -24.51% | -62.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.30% | -4.32% | -94.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -7.05% | -75.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.23% | 5.33% | +9.90% |
Volatility
SZK vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 6.08%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | XLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.54% | 6.08% | +6.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.42% | 11.61% | +11.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 14.16% | +14.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 13.61% | +18.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 14.86% | +18.91% |
SZK vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than XLP's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.79% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.58% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and XLP have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZK has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to XLP (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs XLP's -35.90%.
On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.36% vs -16.29% for SZK. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.36% return vs -16.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.
SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.58% for XLP.
SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.08% for XLP.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZK and XLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer