SZK vs. SQQQ
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SZK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SZK returned -16.18%/yr vs -54.51%/yr for SQQQ. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SZK vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -17.29% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -38.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SZK has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -16.18%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.51% annualized return.
SZK
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -17.29%
- 1Y
- -11.21%
- 3Y*
- -6.28%
- 5Y*
- -3.89%
- 10Y*
- -16.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.48%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -34.63%
- YTD
- -38.05%
- 1Y
- -54.82%
- 3Y*
- -52.10%
- 5Y*
- -44.80%
- 10Y*
- -54.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.77B | $2.43B | $2.72B | |
| $73.06K | $65.38K | $43.91K |
SZK vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -17.29% | 3.37% | -11.33% | -3.10% | 47.20% | -37.78% | -58.24% | -39.43% | 33.62% | -27.22% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -38.05% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and SQQQ is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SZK and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
SQQQ
SZK vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZK | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.92 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | -1.65 | +0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZK vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -100.00% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -59.62% | +30.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | -92.51% | +50.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | -97.27% | +55.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | -99.97% | +13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.30% | -100.00% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -92.78% | +10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.27% | 35.25% | -19.98% |
Volatility
SZK vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) is 11.76%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 21.07%. This indicates that SZK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 21.07% | -9.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.18% | 48.20% | -25.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.25% | 57.95% | -29.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 68.24% | -36.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 66.78% | -33.00% |
SZK vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZK and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SZK vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than SQQQ's 9.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.64% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.78% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to SZK (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SZK leads with -16.18% vs -54.51% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SZK has been the lower-risk option at 11.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SZK has performed better with a -16.18% return vs -54.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SZK and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 2.78% for SZK.
SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SZK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZK and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer