SZK vs. CDL
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while CDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SZK returned -16.07%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for CDL. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CDL.
Performance
SZK vs. CDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -9.91% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 11.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SZK has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of -16.07%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.90% annualized return.
SZK
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- -9.91%
- 6M
- -7.73%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- -4.29%
- 5Y*
- -3.68%
- 10Y*
- -16.07%
CDL
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
SZK vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -9.91% | 3.37% | -11.33% | -3.10% | 47.20% | -37.78% | -58.24% | -39.43% | 33.62% | -27.22% |
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 11.10% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and CDL is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015 | -0.61 |
The correlation between SZK and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
CDL
SZK vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 1.99 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | 2.95 | -2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.34 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 3.42 | -3.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 12.20 | -11.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 1.99 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.64 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | 0.64 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.65 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
SZK vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than CDL's maximum drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and CDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -41.03% | -58.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -5.66% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | -12.87% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | -17.28% | -24.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | -41.03% | -45.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.24% | -1.59% | -97.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -4.35% | -77.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.83% | 1.59% | +11.24% |
Volatility
SZK vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 2.80%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 2.80% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | 6.90% | +13.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.18% | 9.73% | +15.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 13.85% | +17.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 17.04% | +16.57% |
SZK vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than CDL's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.15% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.63% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and CDL have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZK has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to CDL (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs CDL's -41.03%.
On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 10.90% vs -16.07% for SZK. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 10.90% return vs -16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.63% for SZK.
SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.35% for CDL.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZK and CDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer