SZK vs. CDL
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and CDL (VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZK is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while CDL is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SZK returned -16.29%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for CDL. Their -0.61 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CDL.
Performance
SZK vs. CDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZK achieves a -17.72% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 17.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SZK has underperformed CDL with an annualized return of -16.29%, while CDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.
SZK
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -17.72%
- 1Y
- -11.68%
- 3Y*
- -5.80%
- 5Y*
- -3.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.29%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.51%
CDL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.48K | $625.50K | $553.90K | |
| $85.70K | $65.45K | $43.62K |
SZK vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -17.72% | 3.37% | -11.33% | -3.10% | 47.20% | -37.78% | -58.24% | -39.43% | 33.62% | -27.22% |
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 17.17% | 9.04% | 15.58% | 3.03% | -0.45% | 33.42% | -3.35% | 26.38% | -5.86% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and CDL is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | -0.61 |
The correlation between SZK and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.67 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
CDL
SZK vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.36 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.87 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | 13.78 | -14.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZK vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than CDL's maximum drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and CDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -41.03% | -58.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | -5.66% | -23.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | -12.87% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | -17.28% | -24.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | -41.03% | -45.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.30% | -2.35% | -96.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -4.29% | -77.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.23% | 1.59% | +13.64% |
Volatility
SZK vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 4.20%. This indicates that SZK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | CDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.54% | 4.20% | +8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.42% | 7.85% | +15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 10.34% | +17.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 13.88% | +18.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 17.04% | +16.73% |
SZK vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CDL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CDL's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDL VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.06% | 3.33% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 3.31% | 2.60% | 3.32% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 2.87% | 2.97% | 1.28% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.79% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and CDL have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SZK has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to CDL (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZK dropped -99.40% vs CDL's -41.03%.
On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 11.17% vs -16.29% for SZK. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 11.17% return vs -16.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.
CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.79% for SZK.
SZK is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CDL is Dividend. SZK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (-200%), while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.35% for CDL.
CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZK and CDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer