SYLD vs. XSVM
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. SYLD is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.58%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for XSVM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
SYLD vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 21.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SYLD having a 13.58% annualized return and XSVM not far behind at 13.23%.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 17.19%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
XSVM
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 6M
- 18.48%
- 1Y
- 42.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
SYLD vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 17.19% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 21.88% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and XSVM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SYLD and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SYLD vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SYLD
XSVM
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SYLD
XSVM
Financial Services
SYLD
XSVM
Energy
SYLD
XSVM
Industrials
SYLD
XSVM
Basic Materials
SYLD
XSVM
Consumer Defensive
SYLD
XSVM
Communication Services
SYLD
XSVM
Healthcare
SYLD
XSVM
Technology
SYLD
XSVM
Real Estate
SYLD
-
XSVM
Utilities
SYLD
-
XSVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
XSVM
SYLD vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYLD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 3.86 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.04 | 11.98 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -62.57% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -10.08% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -26.21% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -26.21% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -49.02% | +3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -11.55% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.26% | -0.71% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) is 3.35%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that SYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 5.09% | -1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 12.03% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 18.60% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 22.61% | -2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 25.08% | -2.13% |
SYLD vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than XSVM's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.81% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and XSVM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to SYLD (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs XSVM's -62.57%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.58% vs 13.23% for XSVM. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 13.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
SYLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 1.74% for XSVM.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer