PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR4.DE vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR4.DE is traded in EUR, while VUG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VUG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR4.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 7.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR4.DE has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 14.76%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.64% annualized return.


SXR4.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.37%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.25%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
14.32%
10Y*
14.76%

VUG

1D
-2.85%
1M
2.01%
YTD
7.87%
6M
5.67%
1Y
23.16%
3Y*
21.43%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
17.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
11.29%4.62%32.33%23.44%-15.85%38.32%9.25%34.28%-1.46%6.54%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.87%5.23%41.45%42.43%-29.02%36.87%28.69%40.13%1.22%12.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR4.DE and VUG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.58

The correlation between SXR4.DE and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR4.DE vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR4.DE
SXR4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR4.DEVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

1.48

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

4.46

+7.46

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR4.DE and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR4.DEVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.42

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.71

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.81

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.67

+0.10

Drawdowns

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR4.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -44.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR4.DE and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR4.DEVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-44.50%

+10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-15.71%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-27.44%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-31.45%

+7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-31.83%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-3.89%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-7.85%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

5.21%

-3.10%

Volatility

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) is 2.73%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that SXR4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR4.DEVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

4.37%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

11.93%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

16.37%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

21.90%

-6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

21.75%

-5.52%

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR4.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR4.DE vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

SXR4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR4.DE and VUG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SXR4.DE.

SXR4.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SXR4.DE tracks MSCI USA, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXR4.DE and 0.03% for VUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR4.DE and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer