SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC
SXR4.DE (iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, SXR4.DE returned 14.76%/yr vs 13.40%/yr for ^GSPC. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXR4.DE is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXR4.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR4.DE has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 14.76%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.40% annualized return.
SXR4.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.76%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXR4.DE iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.29% | 4.62% | 32.33% | 23.44% | -15.85% | 38.32% | 9.25% | 34.28% | -1.46% | 6.54% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 12.06% | 2.58% | 31.45% | 20.51% | -14.45% | 36.38% | 6.68% | 31.79% | -1.84% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXR4.DE and ^GSPC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SXR4.DE and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
SXR4.DE
^GSPC
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXR4.DE | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.30 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 12.34 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXR4.DE | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.04 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.80 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.72 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.51 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXR4.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR4.DE and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXR4.DE | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -51.62% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.36% | -7.57% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.63% | -23.99% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.63% | -23.99% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.16% | -33.42% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.20% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -9.08% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.02% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SXR4.DE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.24%. This indicates that SXR4.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXR4.DE | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.24% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 8.62% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 12.29% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 16.79% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 18.59% | -2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXR4.DE and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SXR4.DE and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer