PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXQG vs. TDVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXQG vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 8.04% return.


SXQG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-6.02%
6M
-6.98%
1Y
-1.59%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
4.23%
10Y*

TDVG

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.22%
YTD
8.04%
6M
7.41%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXQG vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
-6.02%4.43%18.77%28.32%-23.93%12.62%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
8.04%14.80%13.45%13.95%-10.15%12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SXQG and TDVG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021

0.82

The correlation between SXQG and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXQG vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXQG
TDVG

Technology

31.9%
26.2%

Communication Services

16.0%
1.0%

Healthcare

16.0%
12.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
7.2%

Industrials

5.4%
13.6%

Energy

0.6%
5.3%

Basic Materials

0.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

3.8%

Technology

SXQG
31.9%
TDVG
26.2%

Communication Services

SXQG
16.0%
TDVG
1.0%

Healthcare

SXQG
16.0%
TDVG
12.4%

Financial Services

SXQG
11.5%
TDVG
19.3%

Consumer Defensive

SXQG
11.5%
TDVG
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SXQG
6.9%
TDVG
7.2%

Industrials

SXQG
5.4%
TDVG
13.6%

Energy

SXQG
0.6%
TDVG
5.3%

Basic Materials

SXQG
0.2%
TDVG
2.8%

Real Estate

SXQG

-

TDVG
1.6%

Utilities

SXQG

-

TDVG
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXQG vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXQG
SXQG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SXQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXQG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
SXQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXQG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TDVG
TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXQG vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXQGTDVGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.32

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

2.44

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.31

10.01

-10.32

SXQG vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXQG Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXQG and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXQG vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and TDVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXQGTDVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-19.20%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-7.24%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-14.02%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.97%

-19.20%

-14.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-0.82%

-7.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-3.73%

-6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

1.76%

+3.36%

Volatility

SXQG vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.78%. This indicates that SXQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXQGTDVGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.78%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

7.61%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.77%

9.79%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

13.92%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

13.90%

+4.03%

SXQG vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXQG vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than TDVG's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
0.07%0.15%0.00%0.02%0.09%0.00%0.00%
TDVG
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
0.98%1.00%1.06%1.31%1.15%0.80%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXQG and TDVG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SXQG has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to TDVG (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

On 5-year performance, TDVG leads with 10.19% vs 4.23% for SXQG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TDVG has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.07% for SXQG.

They also come from different issuers: Meridian and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.50% for TDVG.

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXQG and TDVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer