SXQG vs. QDEF
SXQG (ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF) and QDEF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. SXQG is actively managed, while QDEF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXQG returned 4.34%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for QDEF. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SXQG charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDEF.
Performance
SXQG vs. QDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.00% return, which is significantly lower than QDEF's 10.48% return.
SXQG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.71%
QDEF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $546.87K | $522.47K | $732.31K | |
| $62.10K | $170.59K | $108.05K |
SXQG vs. QDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | -2.00% | 4.43% | 18.77% | 28.32% | -23.93% | 12.62% |
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 10.48% | 17.43% | 21.19% | 17.48% | -10.94% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXQG and QDEF is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SXQG and QDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXQG vs. QDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXQG
QDEF
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SXQG
QDEF
Healthcare
SXQG
QDEF
Communication Services
SXQG
QDEF
Financial Services
SXQG
QDEF
Consumer Defensive
SXQG
QDEF
Consumer Cyclical
SXQG
QDEF
Industrials
SXQG
QDEF
Energy
SXQG
QDEF
Basic Materials
SXQG
QDEF
Real Estate
SXQG
-
QDEF
Utilities
SXQG
-
QDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXQG vs. QDEF — Risk / Return Rank
SXQG
QDEF
SXQG vs. QDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXQG | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.38 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.93 | -2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 12.20 | -12.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXQG vs. QDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, roughly equal to the maximum QDEF drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and QDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXQG | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -35.74% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -6.95% | -7.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -14.43% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.97% | -21.37% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -0.58% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.99% | -3.27% | -6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.49% | 1.67% | +3.82% |
Volatility
SXQG vs. QDEF - Volatility Comparison
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) at 2.29%. This indicates that SXQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXQG | QDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.29% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 7.47% | +2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 9.85% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 13.77% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 16.14% | +1.73% |
SXQG vs. QDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QDEF's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXQG vs. QDEF - Dividend Comparison
SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QDEF's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDEF FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.74% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 2.42% | 1.84% | 2.50% | 3.17% | 7.10% | 2.70% | 2.90% | 3.00% |
SXQG ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXQG and QDEF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SXQG has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to QDEF (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs QDEF's -35.74%.
On 5-year performance, QDEF leads with 12.34% vs 4.34% for SXQG. On fees, QDEF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, QDEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QDEF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDEF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.
QDEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.01% for SXQG.
They also come from different issuers: Meridian and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.37% for QDEF.
QDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SXQG and QDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer