PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXQG vs. GQGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXQG vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXQG achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 5.66% return.


SXQG

1D
-1.40%
1M
2.40%
6M
-1.13%
YTD
-2.99%
1Y
-0.98%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*

GQGU

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.20%
6M
4.36%
YTD
5.66%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXQG vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
-2.99%2.64%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
5.66%-1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SXQG and GQGU is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXQG vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXQG
SXQG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SXQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXQG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SXQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXQG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GQGU
GQGU Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GQGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGU Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXQG vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXQGGQGUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.09

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.60

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.18

1.45

-1.63

SXQG vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXQG Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the GQGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXQG and GQGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXQG vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXQG drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXQG and GQGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXQGGQGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.97%

-8.41%

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.03%

-8.41%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-5.49%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-2.92%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.50%

+1.86%

Volatility

SXQG vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison

ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) at 4.36%. This indicates that SXQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXQGGQGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.36%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.96%

8.42%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

10.70%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

10.66%

+7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.90%

10.66%

+7.24%

SXQG vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXQG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXQG vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

SXQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXQG
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF
0.03%0.15%0.00%0.02%0.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXQG and GQGU have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SXQG has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to GQGU (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SXQG dropped -33.97% vs GQGU's -8.41%.

On 1-year performance, GQGU leads with 5.06% vs -0.98% for SXQG. On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GQGU has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GQGU has performed better with a 5.06% return vs -0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SXQG.

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.03% for SXQG.

They also come from different issuers: Meridian and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SXQG and 0.49% for GQGU.

GQGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXQG and GQGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer