SWYFX vs. SCHZ
SWYFX (Schwab Target 2035 Index Fund) and SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both funds - SWYFX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, SWYFX returned 7.74%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for SCHZ. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWYFX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHZ.
Performance
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYFX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHZ's 0.60% return.
SWYFX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.50%
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYFX Schwab Target 2035 Index Fund | 8.10% | 16.40% | 11.71% | 18.20% | -16.36% | 14.26% | 13.85% | 22.37% | -7.99% | 17.84% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.60% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYFX and SCHZ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, SWYFX and SCHZ have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWYFX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
SWYFX
SCHZ
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2035 Index Fund (SWYFX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWYFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.85 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 5.42 | +6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYFX drawdown since its inception was -25.51%, which is greater than SCHZ's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYFX and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.51% | -18.74% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.82% | -2.70% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.61% | -6.18% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -18.01% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -2.17% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -3.68% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 0.92% | +0.64% |
Volatility
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2035 Index Fund (SWYFX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) at 1.33%. This indicates that SWYFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWYFX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 1.33% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 2.76% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.30% | 3.74% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 6.09% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 5.42% | +7.43% |
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYFX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWYFX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
SWYFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
SWYFX Schwab Target 2035 Index Fund | 2.11% | 2.28% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.02% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 1.44% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWYFX and SCHZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWYFX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SCHZ (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYFX dropped -25.51% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.
SWYFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWYFX and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer