SWOBX vs. SNXFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX).
SWOBX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Nov 17, 1996. SNXFX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 1991.
Performance
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | -4.75% | 12.76% | 12.51% | 18.25% | -18.86% | 14.76% | 14.73% | 20.13% | -4.35% | 15.52% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | -6.94% | 17.23% | 24.46% | 26.53% | -19.46% | 26.10% | 20.71% | 31.43% | -5.04% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWOBX achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than SNXFX's -6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SWOBX has underperformed SNXFX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while SNXFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.
SWOBX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 9.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
SNXFX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -4.75%
- 1Y
- 14.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWOBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SNXFX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWOBX vs. SNXFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWOBX
SNXFX
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWOBX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.82 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.27 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.02 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.34 | 4.97 | +0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWOBX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.82 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWOBX and SNXFX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Dividend Comparison
SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than SNXFX's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 5.75% | 5.47% | 4.94% | 5.67% | 10.21% | 6.47% | 2.97% | 5.21% | 7.11% | 3.20% | 7.83% | 7.66% |
SNXFX Schwab 1000 Index Fund | 1.56% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 3.01% | 6.49% | 4.23% | 3.41% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWOBX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum SNXFX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWOBX and SNXFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWOBX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -55.08% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.36% | -12.33% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | -25.36% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.30% | -34.58% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -8.94% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -8.80% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.54% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SWOBX vs. SNXFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) is 3.45%, while Schwab 1000 Index Fund (SNXFX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that SWOBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNXFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWOBX | SNXFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 4.35% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 9.32% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 18.40% | -7.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 17.28% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 18.69% | -5.86% |