SWOBX vs. TRSGX
SWOBX (Schwab Balanced Fund™) and TRSGX (T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SWOBX returned 9.00%/yr vs 10.77%/yr for TRSGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWOBX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for TRSGX.
Performance
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWOBX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than TRSGX's 9.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SWOBX has underperformed TRSGX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while TRSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.
SWOBX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 4.33%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
TRSGX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 4.87% | 12.76% | 12.51% | 18.25% | -18.86% | 14.76% | 14.73% | 20.13% | -4.35% | 15.52% |
TRSGX T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund | 9.27% | 17.00% | 12.40% | 18.04% | -19.70% | 14.03% | 16.66% | 24.69% | -6.02% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWOBX and TRSGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SWOBX and TRSGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWOBX vs. TRSGX — Risk / Return Rank
SWOBX
TRSGX
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) and T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund (TRSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWOBX | TRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 2.68 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 11.67 | -1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWOBX drawdown since its inception was -35.99%, smaller than the maximum TRSGX drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWOBX and TRSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWOBX | TRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.99% | -51.79% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.58% | -8.32% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.72% | -12.78% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.30% | -26.83% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.30% | -29.62% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.30% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.15% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 1.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Balanced Fund™ (SWOBX) is 3.46%, while T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund (TRSGX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that SWOBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWOBX | TRSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 4.07% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 8.94% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.10% | 10.73% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 12.91% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 13.86% | -0.95% |
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWOBX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSGX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWOBX vs. TRSGX - Dividend Comparison
SWOBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, less than TRSGX's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWOBX Schwab Balanced Fund™ | 5.22% | 5.47% | 4.94% | 5.67% | 10.21% | 6.47% | 2.97% | 5.21% | 7.11% | 3.20% | 7.83% | 7.66% |
TRSGX T. Rowe Price Spectrum Moderate Growth Allocation Fund | 6.11% | 6.68% | 6.48% | 1.84% | 7.61% | 9.36% | 2.60% | 3.51% | 7.11% | 3.57% | 2.20% | 6.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SWOBX and TRSGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TRSGX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to SWOBX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWOBX dropped -35.99% vs TRSGX's -51.79%.
TRSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWOBX and TRSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer