SWLGX vs. SCHG
SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Charles Schwab - SWLGX tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWLGX returned 16.03%/yr vs 15.59%/yr for SCHG. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWLGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.42% return.
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 7.15%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 27.46%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 16.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.59%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 8.61% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 6.42% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWLGX and SCHG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SWLGX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWLGX
SCHG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
SWLGX
SCHG
Communication Services
SWLGX
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
SWLGX
SCHG
Healthcare
SWLGX
SCHG
Industrials
SWLGX
SCHG
Financial Services
SWLGX
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
SWLGX
SCHG
Real Estate
SWLGX
SCHG
Energy
SWLGX
SCHG
Basic Materials
SWLGX
SCHG
Utilities
SWLGX
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWLGX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
SWLGX
SCHG
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWLGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.60 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 2.18 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.28 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.51 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 5.04 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWLGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.70 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWLGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -34.59% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.16% | -16.41% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.30% | -23.39% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.69% | -34.59% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.78% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -5.20% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 4.90% | -0.10% |
Volatility
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) is 3.30%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that SWLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWLGX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | 3.61% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 11.62% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 15.50% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.49% | 22.27% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 21.55% | +1.13% |
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWLGX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.42% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SWLGX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHG has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to SWLGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLGX dropped -32.69% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWLGX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer