SWK vs. KMB
SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, SWK returned -0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SWK vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWK achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SWK has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -0.15%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.
SWK
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SWK vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 15.04% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWK and KMB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.29 |
The correlation between SWK and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SWK:
$2.65
KMB:
$5.93
SWK:
31.61
KMB:
17.26
SWK:
0.84
KMB:
2.06
SWK:
$15.13B
KMB:
$16.54B
SWK:
$4.52B
KMB:
$5.93B
SWK:
$1.39B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWK vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
SWK
KMB
SWK vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWK | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.87 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | -0.67 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | -1.03 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWK vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWK drawdown since its inception was -71.31%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWK and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWK | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.31% | -36.97% | -34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.14% | -29.60% | +3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.31% | -34.06% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.86% | -34.06% | -35.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.31% | -34.06% | -37.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.51% | -26.52% | -27.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.46% | -8.85% | -10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.75% | 19.43% | -7.68% |
Volatility
SWK vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a higher volatility of 10.14% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that SWK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWK | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.14% | 8.42% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.24% | 16.67% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.82% | 25.77% | +12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 20.19% | +17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.69% | 21.07% | +15.62% |
Dividends
SWK vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
SWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.97% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
SWK vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SWK vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWK and KMB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWK dropped -71.31% vs KMB's -36.97%.
SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWK and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer