PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHFX vs. SFLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 7.70%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.


SWHFX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.33%
6M
3.12%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
7.70%
ALL TIME*
8.71%

SFLNX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.26%
6M
12.56%
YTD
17.37%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
14.18%
ALL TIME*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
5.02%9.81%0.10%0.73%-4.66%23.36%12.83%17.64%3.68%20.31%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
17.37%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and SFLNX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SWHFX and SFLNX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWHFX
SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWHFXSFLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.52

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

4.87

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

19.48

-17.16

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and SFLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHFXSFLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.10%

-56.18%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-6.10%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-16.27%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-18.98%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-37.59%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.50%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-5.96%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

1.53%

+4.92%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.33%. This indicates that SWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHFXSFLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

2.33%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

7.49%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

10.50%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.16%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.34%

-2.29%

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHFX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.43%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
0.00%0.00%9.49%3.60%4.18%12.52%11.47%4.56%10.02%7.32%2.63%16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHFX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWHFX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to SFLNX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHFX and SFLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer