SWHFX vs. FHLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SWHFX (Schwab Health Care Fund™) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX returned 7.79%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for FHLC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWHFX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.

Performance

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than FHLC's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 7.79%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.

SWHFX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: -2.86%
• 6M: -3.39%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: 2.90%
• 10Y*: 7.79%

FHLC

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: -0.37%
• 1Y: 19.38%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: 4.57%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™	-2.86%	9.81%	0.10%	0.73%	-4.66%	23.36%	12.83%	17.64%	3.68%	20.31%
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	0.11%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and FHLC is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.96

The correlation between SWHFX and FHLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHFX

SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 7
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 38
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWHFX	FHLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.32	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	2.04	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.23	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	1.88	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.27	4.64	-3.36

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and FHLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWHFX	FHLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.10%	-28.76%	-14.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.74%	-10.38%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-16.87%	-2.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	-17.73%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.28%	-28.76%	+1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.92%	-3.08%	-6.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.17%	-5.19%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	4.19%	+2.14%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) have volatilities of 4.94% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWHFX	FHLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	5.04%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	10.54%	-0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	14.73%	+1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	15.03%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	16.82%	-0.83%

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWHFX vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.38%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
SWHFX Schwab Health Care Fund™	0.00%	0.00%	9.49%	3.60%	4.18%	12.52%	11.47%	4.56%	10.02%	7.32%	2.63%	16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWHFX and FHLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SWHFX and FHLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SWHFX or FHLC?

FHLC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SWHFX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.