PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHFX vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHFX vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 7.70%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


SWHFX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.33%
6M
3.12%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
7.70%
ALL TIME*
8.71%

VHT

1D
-0.76%
1M
-1.17%
6M
6.86%
YTD
6.65%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$66.49M$76.90M$73.37M

SWHFX vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
5.02%9.81%0.10%0.73%-4.66%23.36%12.83%17.64%3.68%20.31%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
6.65%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and VHT is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.94

The correlation between SWHFX and VHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWHFX
SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWHFX vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWHFXVHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

2.74

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

6.79

-4.48

SWHFX vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHFXVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.10%

-39.12%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-10.40%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-16.91%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-17.71%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-28.85%

+1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-2.69%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-5.96%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

4.19%

+2.26%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHFXVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

5.54%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

11.64%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

15.35%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.25%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

17.02%

-0.97%

SWHFX vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHFX vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

SWHFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
0.00%0.00%9.49%3.60%4.18%12.52%11.47%4.56%10.02%7.32%2.63%16.31%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.55%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SWHFX and VHT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWHFX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to VHT (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs VHT's -39.12%.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHFX and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer