PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 14.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 11.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has underperformed SCHX with an annualized return of 14.21%, while SCHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.92%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.98%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
14.21%

SCHX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.43%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.13%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.50%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and SCHX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.93

The correlation between SFLNX and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFLNX
SCHX

Technology

19.0%
37.5%

Financial Services

13.9%
9.9%

Healthcare

11.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

10.3%
10.3%

Energy

10.2%
3.4%

Industrials

9.4%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Utilities

3.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

SFLNX
19.0%
SCHX
37.5%

Financial Services

SFLNX
13.9%
SCHX
9.9%

Healthcare

SFLNX
11.9%
SCHX
8.4%

Communication Services

SFLNX
10.3%
SCHX
10.3%

Energy

SFLNX
10.2%
SCHX
3.4%

Industrials

SFLNX
9.4%
SCHX
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SFLNX
9.2%
SCHX
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

SFLNX
7.4%
SCHX
4.5%

Basic Materials

SFLNX
3.7%
SCHX
1.8%

Utilities

SFLNX
3.2%
SCHX
2.6%

Real Estate

SFLNX
1.8%
SCHX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXSCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

2.45

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.45

3.32

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.44

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

3.31

+2.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.23

15.11

+6.13

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

2.45

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.80

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.86

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.85

-0.32

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-34.33%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-9.02%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-19.04%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-25.41%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-34.33%

-3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-3.97%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.98%

-0.43%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 2.47%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.81%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

9.00%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

11.97%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

17.12%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

18.15%

+0.25%

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than SCHX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.47%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFLNX and SCHX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to SFLNX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLNX and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer