PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. VDADX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
2.71%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
VDADX
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares
-1.77%14.17%16.99%14.44%-9.80%23.59%15.47%29.68%-2.06%22.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than VDADX's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed VDADX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while VDADX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
2.71%
6M
6.30%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.25%

VDADX

1D
2.08%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFLNX vs. VDADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VDADX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. VDADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VDADX
VDADX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VDADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDADX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VDADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDADX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXVDADXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.83

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.28

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.28

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

5.71

+2.51

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the VDADX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and VDADX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXVDADXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.83

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.76

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.72

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and VDADX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than VDADX's 1.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.63%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
VDADX
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.58%1.60%1.71%1.86%1.94%1.53%1.61%1.69%2.07%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than VDADX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and VDADX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXVDADXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-31.70%

-24.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-10.87%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-20.42%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-31.70%

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-6.01%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-3.44%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.43%

+0.13%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. VDADX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation Index Fund Admiral Shares (VDADX) have volatilities of 4.01% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXVDADXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

4.12%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

7.86%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

15.33%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

14.30%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

16.19%

+2.22%