PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWHFX vs. AHSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWHFX achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than AHSAX's -2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SWHFX has underperformed AHSAX with an annualized return of 6.99%, while AHSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.16% annualized return.


SWHFX

1D
-1.19%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-5.57%
6M
-10.58%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
6.99%

AHSAX

1D
-2.70%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-2.06%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
8.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
-5.57%9.81%0.10%0.73%-4.66%23.36%12.83%17.64%3.68%20.31%
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
-2.06%10.14%1.17%-4.26%-17.04%3.26%30.99%22.02%5.71%33.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SWHFX and AHSAX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

0.84

The correlation between SWHFX and AHSAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWHFX vs. AHSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWHFX
SWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AHSAX
AHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
AHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWHFXAHSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

1.40

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.50

2.04

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.24

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

2.20

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.74

6.85

-6.11

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the AHSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWHFX and AHSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWHFXAHSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

1.40

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.07

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.32

+0.17

Drawdowns

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWHFX drawdown since its inception was -43.10%, smaller than the maximum AHSAX drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHFX and AHSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWHFXAHSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.10%

-46.23%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.74%

-9.67%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-23.11%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-45.04%

+25.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.28%

-45.04%

+17.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.43%

-28.77%

+16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-14.71%

+6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.00%

3.10%

+2.90%

Volatility

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Health Care Fund™ (SWHFX) is 3.96%, while Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that SWHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AHSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWHFXAHSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

5.42%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

11.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

15.23%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

24.15%

-9.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

23.33%

-7.36%

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWHFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AHSAX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWHFX vs. AHSAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWHFX nor AHSAX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.18%11.68%6.98%7.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWHFX
Schwab Health Care Fund™
0.00%0.00%9.49%3.60%4.18%12.52%11.47%4.56%10.02%7.32%2.63%16.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWHFX and AHSAX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AHSAX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SWHFX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWHFX dropped -43.10% vs AHSAX's -46.23%.

AHSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWHFX and AHSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer