PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHSAX vs. BHCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHSAX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than BHCHX's -5.51% return.


AHSAX

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.19%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.68%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-1.25%
10Y*
8.46%

BHCHX

1D
-1.62%
1M
2.29%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-6.82%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
0.66%10.14%1.17%-4.26%-17.04%3.26%30.99%12.57%
BHCHX
Baron Health Care Fund
-5.51%10.28%1.55%6.42%-16.90%15.71%47.71%18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AHSAX and BHCHX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2019

0.89

The correlation between AHSAX and BHCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AHSAX vs. BHCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHSAX
AHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

BHCHX
BHCHX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BHCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BHCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHSAXBHCHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

0.97

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.47

1.47

+0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

1.00

+1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.46

2.36

+6.10

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BHCHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHSAX and BHCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHSAXBHCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

0.97

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.03

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.49

-0.16

Drawdowns

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than BHCHX's maximum drawdown of -28.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHSAX and BHCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AHSAXBHCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-28.53%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-14.24%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.11%

-20.51%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.04%

-28.53%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.79%

-10.51%

-16.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.70%

-11.06%

-3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

6.07%

-2.99%

Volatility

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) is 4.64%, while Baron Health Care Fund (BHCHX) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that AHSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AHSAXBHCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

5.20%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

11.76%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

15.09%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

17.00%

+7.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

19.73%

+3.59%

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHSAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BHCHX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AHSAX vs. BHCHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither AHSAX nor BHCHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.18%11.68%6.98%7.82%
BHCHX
Baron Health Care Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.00%0.00%1.41%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AHSAX and BHCHX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHCHX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to AHSAX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHSAX dropped -46.23% vs BHCHX's -28.53%.

AHSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AHSAX and BHCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer