AHSAX vs. FACDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX).
AHSAX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002. FACDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | -5.75% | 10.14% | 1.17% | -4.26% | -17.04% | 3.26% | 30.99% | 22.02% | 5.71% | 33.06% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | -9.65% | 14.19% | 3.97% | 3.81% | -13.07% | 11.25% | 21.07% | 27.89% | 7.20% | 24.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHSAX achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly higher than FACDX's -9.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AHSAX having a 8.21% annualized return and FACDX not far ahead at 8.31%.
AHSAX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- -5.75%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -2.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
FACDX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHSAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AHSAX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank
AHSAX
FACDX
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.21 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.42 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 0.21 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 0.63 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.21 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.07 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.44 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.56 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between AHSAX and FACDX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison
AHSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.70%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.18% | 11.68% | 6.98% | 7.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | 14.70% | 13.28% | 12.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.24% | 5.94% | 0.32% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.66% |
Drawdowns
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FACDX drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHSAX and FACDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -44.55% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -13.43% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.04% | -29.35% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.04% | -29.35% | -15.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.45% | -13.43% | -18.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -9.36% | -5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.42% | -1.47% |
Volatility
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) is 4.84%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that AHSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 5.59% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 11.00% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 18.38% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.29% | 17.68% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 18.75% | +4.62% |