AHSAX vs. FACDX
AHSAX (Alger Health Sciences Fund) and FACDX (Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AHSAX returned 9.16%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for FACDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AHSAX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FACDX.
Performance
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHSAX achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly higher than FACDX's -0.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AHSAX having a 9.16% annualized return and FACDX not far behind at 9.08%.
AHSAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 28.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- -1.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
FACDX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | 3.95% | 10.14% | 1.17% | -4.26% | -17.04% | 3.26% | 30.99% | 22.02% | 5.71% | 33.06% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | -0.11% | 14.19% | 3.97% | 3.81% | -13.07% | 11.25% | 21.07% | 27.89% | 7.20% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHSAX and FACDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003 | 0.90 |
The correlation between AHSAX and FACDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHSAX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank
AHSAX
FACDX
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.56 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 4.11 | +4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHSAX drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FACDX drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHSAX and FACDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -44.55% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -13.43% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.11% | -17.49% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.04% | -29.35% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.04% | -29.35% | -15.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.40% | -4.28% | -20.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.73% | -9.35% | -5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 5.09% | -1.94% |
Volatility
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) have volatilities of 5.94% and 6.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHSAX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 6.01% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 12.65% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 16.39% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 18.00% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 18.81% | +4.54% |
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHSAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHSAX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison
AHSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHSAX Alger Health Sciences Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.18% | 11.68% | 6.98% | 7.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | 13.30% | 13.28% | 12.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.24% | 5.94% | 0.32% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHSAX and FACDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FACDX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to AHSAX (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHSAX dropped -46.23% vs FACDX's -44.55%.
AHSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHSAX and FACDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer