SWASX vs. SWLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. SWLSX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005.
Performance
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -7.66% | 14.38% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | -12.73% | 19.69% | 29.41% | 38.27% | -27.00% | 29.03% | 29.03% | 31.02% | -7.93% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than SWLSX's -12.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SWASX has underperformed SWLSX with an annualized return of 3.10%, while SWLSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.02% annualized return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
SWLSX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- -12.73%
- 6M
- -11.11%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
SWLSX
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 2.74 | +1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.69 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.55 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.68 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.51 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and SWLSX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SWLSX's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ | 1.34% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.04% | 2.07% | 7.77% | 1.07% | 5.32% | 12.35% | 7.92% | 4.46% | 17.08% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than SWLSX's maximum drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and SWLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -49.89% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -16.17% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -31.32% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | -31.32% | -12.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -16.17% | +5.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -7.98% | -7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 4.57% | -1.99% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.05%, while Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | SWLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 5.73% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 12.41% | -4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 22.60% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 20.97% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 20.76% | -3.72% |