SWLSX vs. FBGRX

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SWLSX having a 2.93% return and FBGRX slightly lower at 2.85%. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 8.48%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.79% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLSX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

SWLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) is 6.17%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that SWLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.