SWASX vs. FIKLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX).
SWASX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2007. FIKLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | -0.59% | 11.33% | 1.42% | 8.49% | -25.10% | 25.32% | -12.10% | 27.81% | -2.35% |
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | -5.05% | 22.93% | -9.39% | 4.32% | -26.54% | 12.03% | 5.85% | 28.22% | -2.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWASX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FIKLX's -5.05% return.
SWASX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -10.76%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 9.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
FIKLX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -13.68%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- -2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWASX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKLX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWASX vs. FIKLX — Risk / Return Rank
SWASX
FIKLX
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) and Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWASX | FIKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.98 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.36 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.91 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 3.97 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWASX | FIKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.98 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.16 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.17 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWASX and FIKLX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Dividend Comparison
SWASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than FIKLX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWASX Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ | 2.23% | 3.11% | 3.32% | 3.29% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 2.94% | 7.38% | 4.24% | 3.32% | 4.67% | 3.00% |
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | 3.26% | 3.10% | 5.24% | 2.12% | 4.60% | 5.63% | 1.94% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWASX drawdown since its inception was -69.47%, which is greater than FIKLX's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWASX and FIKLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWASX | FIKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -36.93% | -32.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.89% | -13.77% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -36.93% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.76% | -21.17% | +10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -15.69% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.15% | -0.57% |
Volatility
SWASX vs. FIKLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Global Real Estate Fund™ (SWASX) is 4.05%, while Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that SWASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWASX | FIKLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 5.13% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 8.63% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.29% | 12.77% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 13.51% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 14.73% | +2.31% |