FIKLX vs. IGR
FIKLX (Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z) and IGR (CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKLX returned -3.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IGR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIKLX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IGR.
Performance
FIKLX vs. IGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKLX achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than IGR's 10.90% return.
FIKLX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IGR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 2.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
FIKLX vs. IGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | -2.76% | 22.93% | -9.39% | 4.32% | -26.54% | 12.03% | 5.85% | 28.22% | -2.29% |
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | 10.90% | 5.24% | 1.19% | 15.91% | -35.51% | 52.83% | -5.27% | 41.04% | -9.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKLX and IGR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FIKLX and IGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKLX vs. IGR — Risk / Return Rank
FIKLX
IGR
FIKLX vs. IGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) and CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKLX | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.14 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.67 | 0.33 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.17 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 0.43 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKLX | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.14 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.02 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.17 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
FIKLX vs. IGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKLX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum IGR drawdown of -87.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKLX and IGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKLX | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -87.17% | +50.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -16.14% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -29.54% | +11.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -47.61% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.27% | -11.72% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -24.50% | +8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 6.47% | -1.52% |
Volatility
FIKLX vs. IGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z (FIKLX) is 3.54%, while CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund (IGR) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that FIKLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKLX | IGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 6.47% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 14.70% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 18.59% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 24.77% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 24.47% | -9.73% |
FIKLX vs. IGR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKLX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IGR's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKLX vs. IGR - Dividend Comparison
FIKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than IGR's 15.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKLX Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund Class Z | 3.18% | 3.10% | 5.24% | 2.12% | 4.60% | 5.63% | 1.94% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGR CBRE Global Real Estate Income Fund | 15.79% | 16.44% | 14.97% | 15.38% | 12.22% | 6.13% | 8.72% | 7.48% | 9.74% | 7.58% | 8.84% | 7.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKLX and IGR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGR has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to FIKLX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKLX dropped -36.93% vs IGR's -87.17%.
FIKLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKLX and IGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer