SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) and XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO returned 12.54%/yr vs 28.50%/yr for XRH0.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVR-C.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for XRH0.L.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD, while XRH0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XRH0.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly higher than XRH0.L's -25.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO has underperformed XRH0.L with an annualized return of 12.54%, while XRH0.L has yielded a comparatively higher 28.50% annualized return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -19.40%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 6M
- -19.83%
- 1Y
- 70.15%
- 3Y*
- 39.87%
- 5Y*
- 20.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -25.47%
- 6M
- -20.94%
- 1Y
- 46.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- -12.84%
- 10Y*
- 28.50%
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -14.35% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.69% | -13.03% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -25.47% | 191.29% | -7.47% | -61.74% | 1.59% | -15.55% | 176.49% | 123.24% | 58.69% | 86.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and XRH0.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2012 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
XRH0.L
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVR-C.TO | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.18 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.15 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 2.13 | +0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum XRH0.L drawdown of -85.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and XRH0.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.26% | -85.17% | +31.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.86% | -39.89% | -8.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.86% | -43.80% | -5.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.86% | -79.89% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.86% | -85.17% | +36.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.01% | -63.42% | +16.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -46.06% | +17.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.60% | 21.58% | +1.02% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) is 15.32%, while Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a volatility of 28.15%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRH0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | XRH0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.32% | 28.15% | -12.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.48% | 70.26% | -13.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.58% | 89.57% | -30.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.84% | 69.12% | -33.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 66.96% | -35.23% |
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than XRH0.L's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. XRH0.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SVR-C.TO nor XRH0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR-C.TO and XRH0.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SVR-C.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SVR-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
SVR-C.TO is categorized as Silver, while XRH0.L is Metals. SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XRH0.L tracks Rhodium. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.95% for XRH0.L.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and XRH0.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer