SVM vs. PPLT
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) is a stock, while PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 16.92%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -24.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 16.92%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.32% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 140.00%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
PPLT
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -19.03%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 6M
- -28.86%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
SVM vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 21.23% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -24.21% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and PPLT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SVM and PPLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (10 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
PPLT
SVM vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 0.34 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 0.78 | +8.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -70.73% | -27.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -43.98% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -43.98% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -43.98% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -51.14% | -25.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.92% | -43.98% | -4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.59% | -39.94% | -31.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.57% | 19.30% | -4.73% |
Volatility
SVM vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 27.03% compared to abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 12.58%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.03% | 12.58% | +14.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.80% | 43.67% | +14.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.44% | 50.52% | +19.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 32.78% | +23.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 29.21% | +32.72% |
Dividends
SVM vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and PPLT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (27.03%) compared to PPLT (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs PPLT's -70.73%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer