SVM vs. MNS.TO
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) is a stock, while MNS.TO (Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves) is Silver fund tracking the N/A (Physical Bullion). Over the past 5 years, SVM returned 13.81%/yr vs 16.91%/yr for MNS.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVM is traded in USD, while MNS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MNS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than MNS.TO's -25.76% return.
SVM
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- -20.20%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 140.00%
- 3Y*
- 53.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.92%
MNS.TO
- 1D
- 2.77%
- 1M
- -20.90%
- YTD
- -25.76%
- 6M
- -29.21%
- 1Y
- 59.09%
- 3Y*
- 39.00%
- 5Y*
- 16.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 21.23% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | -25.76% | 173.61% | 30.67% | -3.55% | -1.01% | -15.42% | 49.24% | 14.57% | -9.28% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and MNS.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2016 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SVM and MNS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. MNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
MNS.TO
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 1.20 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 2.80 | +6.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, which is greater than MNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -49.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and MNS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -49.67% | -48.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -49.67% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -49.67% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.98% | -49.67% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.92% | -45.50% | -3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.59% | -17.27% | -54.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.57% | 21.13% | -6.56% |
Volatility
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 27.03% compared to Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) at 14.87%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | MNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.03% | 14.87% | +12.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.80% | 52.95% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.44% | 56.45% | +13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 35.25% | +20.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 31.97% | +29.96% |
Dividends
SVM vs. MNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while MNS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNS.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and MNS.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SVM and MNS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer