PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNS.TO vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MNS.TO is traded in CAD, while PSLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNS.TO achieves a -23.86% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -15.02% return.


MNS.TO

1D
-5.73%
1M
-20.12%
YTD
-23.86%
6M
-23.85%
1Y
62.59%
3Y*
42.48%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*

PSLV

1D
-5.78%
1M
-17.58%
YTD
-15.02%
6M
-15.67%
1Y
63.53%
3Y*
39.82%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves
-23.86%161.12%41.73%-5.85%5.27%-15.46%45.70%9.85%-1.65%-1.63%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-15.02%133.89%29.54%-4.27%9.25%-14.18%39.42%12.17%-4.42%-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MNS.TO and PSLV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2016

0.68

The correlation between MNS.TO and PSLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNS.TO vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNS.TO
MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNS.TOPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.25

3.18

+0.06

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNS.TO and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -69.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNS.TO and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNS.TOPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-69.55%

+26.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.46%

-44.30%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.46%

-44.30%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.46%

-44.30%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.46%

-44.30%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-47.88%

+30.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.34%

20.03%

-0.69%

Volatility

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) is 12.07%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 15.00%. This indicates that MNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNS.TOPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

15.00%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.64%

58.28%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.40%

59.74%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.39%

36.44%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.15%

31.94%

-0.79%

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNS.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNS.TO vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNS.TO nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MNS.TO and PSLV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MNS.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MNS.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for PSLV.

MNS.TO tracks N/A (Physical Bullion), while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). They also come from different issuers: Royal Canadian Mint and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MNS.TO and 0.51% for PSLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNS.TO and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer