PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNS.TO
Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves
-7.47%161.12%41.73%-5.85%5.27%-15.46%45.70%9.85%-1.65%-1.63%
SBT.TO
Purpose Silver Bullion Fund
5.57%137.07%18.55%-0.86%1.99%-13.18%48.01%13.31%-12.82%-17.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNS.TO achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than SBT.TO's 5.57% return.


MNS.TO

1D
3.58%
1M
-19.21%
YTD
-7.47%
6M
41.80%
1Y
105.96%
3Y*
44.20%
5Y*
25.15%
10Y*
17.15%

SBT.TO

1D
7.22%
1M
-18.70%
YTD
5.57%
6M
59.78%
1Y
112.02%
3Y*
43.13%
5Y*
23.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNS.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SBT.TO's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNS.TO
MNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SBT.TO
SBT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) and Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNS.TOSBT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

1.98

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.13

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.64

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.75

8.25

+0.50

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the SBT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNS.TO and SBT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNS.TOSBT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.98

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.66

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.22

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between MNS.TO and SBT.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MNS.TO nor SBT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, which is greater than SBT.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNS.TO and SBT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MNS.TOSBT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.12%

-47.82%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.31%

-42.69%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.31%

-42.69%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.29%

-35.43%

+4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.13%

-16.60%

-11.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.10%

13.68%

-1.58%

Volatility

MNS.TO vs. SBT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Silver Reserves (MNS.TO) is 17.10%, while Purpose Silver Bullion Fund (SBT.TO) has a volatility of 19.32%. This indicates that MNS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MNS.TOSBT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.10%

19.32%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.48%

57.11%

-5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

57.02%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

35.62%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.65%

66.79%

-35.14%