SVM vs. F
SVM (Silvercorp Metals Inc.) and F (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. SVM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SVM returned 19.41%/yr vs 6.42%/yr for F. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SVM vs. F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVM achieves a 35.63% return, which is significantly higher than F's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SVM has outperformed F with an annualized return of 19.41%, while F has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.
SVM
- 1D
- 7.52%
- 1M
- -16.64%
- YTD
- 35.63%
- 6M
- 39.13%
- 1Y
- 164.75%
- 3Y*
- 57.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.41%
F
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 6M
- 10.39%
- 1Y
- 49.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
SVM vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 35.63% | 179.29% | 14.88% | -10.33% | -20.60% | -43.52% | 18.54% | 172.27% | -18.96% | 12.52% |
F Ford Motor Company | 15.78% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVM and F is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2005 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
SVM:
$2.50B
F:
$60.41B
SVM:
-$0.05
F:
-$1.52
SVM:
5.67
F:
0.31
SVM:
2.65
F:
1.61
SVM:
$437.11M
F:
$189.86B
SVM:
$254.02M
F:
$17.42B
SVM:
$185.32M
F:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVM vs. F — Risk / Return Rank
SVM
F
SVM vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 2.16 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 5.55 | +7.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVM vs. F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVM drawdown since its inception was -98.00%, roughly equal to the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVM and F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -97.07% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.02% | -22.31% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.86% | -36.51% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.76% | -58.62% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.19% | -64.77% | -11.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.85% | -34.52% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.64% | -44.70% | -26.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.30% | 8.65% | +4.65% |
Volatility
SVM vs. F - Volatility Comparison
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (SVM) has a higher volatility of 26.97% compared to Ford Motor Company (F) at 18.96%. This indicates that SVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.97% | 18.96% | +8.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.61% | 29.63% | +26.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.31% | 37.44% | +31.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.63% | 39.44% | +16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.77% | 37.50% | +24.27% |
Dividends
SVM vs. F - Dividend Comparison
SVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than F's 4.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 4.04% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
SVM Silvercorp Metals Inc. | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.83% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.66% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 2.13% |
Financials
SVM vs. F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Silvercorp Metals Inc. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SVM vs. F - Profitability Comparison
SVM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a gross profit of 99.96M and revenue of 145.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
SVM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported an operating income of 93.44M and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 64.3%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
SVM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Silvercorp Metals Inc. reported a net income of -606.31K and revenue of 145.32M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVM and F have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVM has higher volatility (26.97%) compared to F (18.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVM dropped -98.00% vs F's -97.07%.
SVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVM and F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer