SVAL vs. OMFS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SVAL (iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - SVAL tracks the Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index while OMFS tracks the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVAL returned 7.82%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for OMFS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SVAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for OMFS.

Performance

SVAL vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 19.67% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 18.54% return.

SVAL

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 19.67%
• 6M: 17.31%
• 1Y: 37.13%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: —

OMFS

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 18.54%
• 6M: 16.21%
• 1Y: 33.25%
• 3Y*: 15.98%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAL vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF	19.67%	8.23%	7.54%	12.27%	-10.15%	33.18%	29.82%
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	18.54%	13.34%	3.98%	15.12%	-17.29%	28.60%	34.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAL and OMFS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020	0.91

The correlation between SVAL and OMFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SVAL vs. OMFS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SVAL	OMFS
Financial Services	23.2%	24.3%
Industrials	15.2%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	8.6%
Technology	12.1%	15.3%
Healthcare	10.2%	13.7%
Energy	8.3%	3.4%
Basic Materials	5.6%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	3.7%
Utilities	3.6%	1.1%
Real Estate	3.1%	11.5%
Communication Services	1.0%	0.9%

Return for Risk

SVAL vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAL

SVAL Risk / Return Rank: 72
SVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 74

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 64
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAL vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVAL	OMFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.87	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	2.72	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.17	3.56	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	12.26	+0.87

SVAL vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAL and OMFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVAL vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and OMFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVAL	OMFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-42.50%	+15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-9.38%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	-22.35%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.44%	-29.22%	+1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.32%	-0.44%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-10.42%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	2.72%	+0.12%

Volatility

SVAL vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) is 4.03%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that SVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVAL	OMFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	5.05%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	12.70%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.82%	17.97%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.24%	21.46%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	24.27%	-1.06%

SVAL vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVAL vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than OMFS's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.09%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF	2.14%	2.33%	1.82%	2.25%	2.09%	2.33%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVAL and OMFS in my portfolio?

SVAL and OMFS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVAL or OMFS?

OMFS has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to SVAL (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs OMFS's -42.50%.

Which ETF is better, SVAL or OMFS?

On 5-year performance, SVAL leads with 7.82% vs 6.12% for OMFS. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SVAL or OMFS?

Over the 5-year period, SVAL has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SVAL or OMFS?

SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SVAL or OMFS?

SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.09% for OMFS.

What is the main difference between SVAL and OMFS?

SVAL tracks Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.39% for OMFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.