PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVAL vs. IWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVAL vs. IWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 22.11% return.


SVAL

1D
0.07%
1M
2.76%
YTD
19.19%
6M
16.40%
1Y
38.96%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*

IWO

1D
1.24%
1M
5.90%
YTD
22.11%
6M
17.90%
1Y
43.32%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAL vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
19.19%8.23%7.54%12.27%-10.15%33.18%29.82%
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
22.11%12.90%15.04%18.51%-26.27%2.54%27.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAL and IWO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.78

The correlation between SVAL and IWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SVAL vs. IWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SVAL
IWO

Financial Services

23.2%
7.8%

Industrials

15.2%
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
7.0%

Technology

12.1%
25.9%

Healthcare

10.2%
21.9%

Energy

8.3%
3.1%

Basic Materials

5.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.3%

Utilities

3.6%
0.6%

Real Estate

3.1%
2.0%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.2%

Financial Services

SVAL
23.2%
IWO
7.8%

Industrials

SVAL
15.2%
IWO
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SVAL
12.9%
IWO
7.0%

Technology

SVAL
12.1%
IWO
25.9%

Healthcare

SVAL
10.2%
IWO
21.9%

Energy

SVAL
8.3%
IWO
3.1%

Basic Materials

SVAL
5.6%
IWO
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SVAL
4.0%
IWO
2.3%

Utilities

SVAL
3.6%
IWO
0.6%

Real Estate

SVAL
3.1%
IWO
2.0%

Communication Services

SVAL
1.0%
IWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVAL vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAL
SVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IWO
IWO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAL vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVALIWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.32

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.93

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

10.45

+3.33

SVAL vs. IWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the IWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAL and IWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVAL vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and IWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVALIWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-60.11%

+32.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-14.87%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

-28.57%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

-40.51%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

0.00%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-16.68%

+8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

4.16%

-1.33%

Volatility

SVAL vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) is 4.02%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that SVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVALIWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

7.67%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

16.61%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

22.18%

-4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

24.64%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

24.21%

-0.99%

SVAL vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SVAL vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison

SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than IWO's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.42%0.56%0.80%0.73%0.73%0.32%0.44%0.71%0.76%0.73%0.97%0.89%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.14%2.33%1.82%2.25%2.09%2.33%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVAL and IWO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWO has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to SVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs IWO's -60.11%.

On 5-year performance, SVAL leads with 8.07% vs 5.76% for IWO. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SVAL has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.

SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.42% for IWO.

SVAL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWO is Small Cap Growth Equities. SVAL tracks Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.24% for IWO.

SVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVAL and IWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer