SVAL vs. IWO
SVAL (iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVAL is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVAL returned 8.07%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for IWO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
SVAL vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 19.19% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 22.11% return.
SVAL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 19.19%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 38.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
IWO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 43.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
SVAL vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 19.19% | 8.23% | 7.54% | 12.27% | -10.15% | 33.18% | 29.82% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 22.11% | 12.90% | 15.04% | 18.51% | -26.27% | 2.54% | 27.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVAL and IWO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SVAL and IWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SVAL vs. IWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVAL
IWO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
SVAL
IWO
Industrials
SVAL
IWO
Consumer Cyclical
SVAL
IWO
Technology
SVAL
IWO
Healthcare
SVAL
IWO
Energy
SVAL
IWO
Basic Materials
SVAL
IWO
Consumer Defensive
SVAL
IWO
Utilities
SVAL
IWO
Real Estate
SVAL
IWO
Communication Services
SVAL
IWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVAL vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
SVAL
IWO
SVAL vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVAL | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.38 | 2.93 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 10.45 | +3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVAL vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVAL | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -60.11% | +32.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -14.87% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -28.57% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -40.51% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | 0.00% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -16.68% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.16% | -1.33% |
Volatility
SVAL vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) is 4.02%, while iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that SVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVAL | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 7.67% | -3.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 16.61% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 22.18% | -4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 24.64% | -2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 24.21% | -0.99% |
SVAL vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SVAL vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than IWO's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.14% | 2.33% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVAL and IWO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWO has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to SVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs IWO's -60.11%.
On 5-year performance, SVAL leads with 8.07% vs 5.76% for IWO. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SVAL has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for IWO.
SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.42% for IWO.
SVAL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IWO is Small Cap Growth Equities. SVAL tracks Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while IWO tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.24% for IWO.
SVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVAL and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer