SVAL vs. IWO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO).
SVAL and IWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SVAL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. IWO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000. Both SVAL and IWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SVAL or IWO.
Key characteristics
| SVAL | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.24% | 1.97% |
| 1Y Return | 26.44% | 17.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.04% | -4.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.09 | 0.82 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.01% | 19.84% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.29% | -60.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.54% | -22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVAL and IWO is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SVAL vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than IWO's 1.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SVAL vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SVAL vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SVAL vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than IWO's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.29% | 2.25% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% | 0.73% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
SVAL vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -25.29%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and IWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SVAL vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.