PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSM.L achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than PRAM.L's 19.68% return.


SUSM.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.35%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*

PRAM.L

1D
-3.72%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
19.68%
6M
21.45%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SUSM.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.99%32.23%4.76%1.17%-18.34%-0.87%
PRAM.L
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)
19.68%32.60%7.09%9.87%-17.96%-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSM.L and PRAM.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021

0.90

The correlation between SUSM.L and PRAM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSM.L
SUSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAM.L
PRAM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSM.LPRAM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.43

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

12.35

-3.43

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the PRAM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSM.L and PRAM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSM.LPRAM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.18

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than PRAM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSM.L and PRAM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSM.LPRAM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-31.21%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-12.51%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-16.74%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-6.73%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-10.72%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.48%

+0.11%

Volatility

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) is 7.13%, while Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.L) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that SUSM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRAM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSM.LPRAM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

8.83%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

17.02%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

19.66%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.30%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.30%

+1.93%

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAM.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSM.L vs. PRAM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUSM.L nor PRAM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SUSM.L and PRAM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRAM.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAM.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSM.L.

SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while PRAM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSM.L and 0.10% for PRAM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSM.L and PRAM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer