PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUSM.L is traded in USD, while EMDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSM.L achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV.L's 3.23% return.


SUSM.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
10.99%
6M
13.35%
1Y
32.03%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*

EMDV.L

1D
-1.71%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
3.23%
6M
1.80%
1Y
10.54%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
6.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSM.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.99%32.23%4.76%1.17%-18.34%-1.05%19.02%14.88%-10.27%34.67%
EMDV.L
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.23%19.28%14.38%4.54%-8.97%-0.72%-2.21%11.69%-6.30%27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSM.L and EMDV.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016

0.77

The correlation between SUSM.L and EMDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSM.L
SUSM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDV.L
EMDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSM.LEMDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.12

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

3.09

+5.82

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSM.L and EMDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSM.LEMDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

0.86

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.28

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.06

+0.45

Drawdowns

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, smaller than the maximum EMDV.L drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSM.L and EMDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSM.LEMDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-65.26%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-9.93%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-14.87%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.54%

-30.43%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-18.46%

+11.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-40.76%

+26.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.60%

-0.01%

Volatility

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) at 3.39%. This indicates that SUSM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSM.LEMDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

3.39%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

9.99%

+6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

12.89%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.29%

16.81%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.40%

+1.83%

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUSM.L vs. EMDV.L - Dividend Comparison

SUSM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV.L
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.87%3.90%4.07%4.99%4.45%3.28%3.19%3.83%3.49%2.89%4.15%5.95%
SUSM.L
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSM.L and EMDV.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUSM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUSM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EMDV.L.

SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while EMDV.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSM.L and 0.55% for EMDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSM.L and EMDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer