SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L
SUSM.L (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSM.L returned 3.24%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSM.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUSM.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSM.L achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 8.84% return.
SUSM.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 13.35%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSM.L iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.99% | 32.23% | 4.76% | 1.17% | -18.34% | -1.05% | 19.02% | 14.88% | -10.27% | 34.67% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 8.84% | 17.63% | 25.22% | 26.11% | -18.77% | 29.88% | 17.14% | 31.49% | -5.65% | 21.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSM.L and CSP1.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SUSM.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUSM.L
CSP1.L
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSM.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.97 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 12.82 | -3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSM.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.29 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.64 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.03 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSM.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSM.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSM.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -33.51% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -8.68% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -19.33% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.54% | -25.16% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.78% | -1.85% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -4.09% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 2.02% | +1.57% |
Volatility
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that SUSM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSM.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 2.73% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 8.11% | +7.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.90% | 11.29% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 20.95% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 18.87% | +1.36% |
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSM.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUSM.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSM.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSM.L.
SUSM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSM.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for SUSM.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer